Book Review

The review should include:

  1. The subject of analysis, then what you will analyze.
  2. The relevance of the topic. (Remember that the relevance of the topic does not require proof, it does not cause doubts and should be quite obvious)
  3. Formulation of the main thesis. (It is necessary to point out the central question of the work, the most notable idea of creativity)
  4. Summary of the work. (In this paragraph, you do not need to retell the storyline.) It is necessary to give an overall assessment of the work. To tell what the author showed skill and skill. What exactly is the author’s merit. What innovations did he introduce his work.
  5. Disadvantages, shortcomings. (It should be noted what exactly you had doubts about: what could you attribute to the shortcomings of the text: Do these errors reduce the level of the literary work. Do you need to highlight these shortcomings with wishes for further development of the author’s work, or are they so critical that the author is better drink poison)
  6. Conclusions. (Here you can indicate the originality or secondary nature of the idea.) To draw conclusions about new stages of the author’s work)

The popularity of the review is due to the brevity of its form. The reader can get some impression of the book, detached-subjective.

A detailed retelling reduces the value of the review: first, it is not interesting to read the work itself; secondly, one of the criteria for a weak review is rightly considered substitution of analysis and interpretation of the text by retelling it. Every book begins with a title that you interpret as you read in the process of reading, you solve it. The name of a good work is always multivalve, it is a kind of symbol, a metaphor. A lot to understand and interpret the text can give an analysis of the composition. Reflections on what compositional techniques are used in the work will help the referee to penetrate the author’s intention. On which parts can you separate the text? How are they located? It is important to assess the style, originality of the writer, to disassemble the images, the artistic techniques that he uses in his work. The reviewer examines the “how is made” text, and the review should be written as if no one in the examining committee with the reviewed work is familiar. It is necessary to assume what questions this person can ask and try to prepare answers in advance in the text.

How to write an essay

Essay is a little content that express the exclusively underscored perspective of the writer. It is mandatory to be able to express your thoughts not only aloud, but also to have an ability to express them on paper. Moreover, this is not so easy for every person.

In the modern system of higher education, there is such a form of written work as writing an essay. Often both students and teachers think that it is the same as an article. But there are undoubted contrasts between them. The article will disclose to you how to compose an essay, fundamental guidelines and prerequisites that apply to it.

Instructions

First step.

Consider the content.

Before you begin composing an essay, think about its structure and substance. The most effortless approach to do this is by getting some information about the topic you expound on. Definition of answers related to them will help in composing of the main part. Endeavor to quickly decide the style of your future narrative.

Second step.

Write an essay.

In the first paragraph, formulate the basic idea of your future narrative. Try to attract the attention of your reader, Try to capture his attention. Second, third, and fourth paragraphs are the main part. Give arguments to prove your main idea. If appropriate, give examples from your life. Do not be afraid to enter specific data about your life, about yourself, your family. The main thing is that it should be appropriate. In the final paragraph, make your main idea even stronger. Associate it with the introduction and the main part.

Step three.

Please check.

Check the structure. Is there a logical connection between the paragraphs? Check out if the essay is written in the same style. Remove unnecessary information, the stories should be short and concise. Do not be afraid to rewrite the essay again and again.

Tips and Warnings:

Avoid false emotions and superfluous words.

Find a sincere tone. It should be not very formal, but not very conversational.

Add a note of optimism in your essay.

Good luck with your essay and exams.

6 things that should be changed at diploma

I guess lots of students meet such situation when you learn so much about your diplomas topic but every time you think you done while your master thinks you are not. And send you back, again and again, to reread, to rewrite, rewatch and 100 other reasons. Let’s try to look for quite common mistakes.

Mistake 1.  

Poor level of independent understanding of the problem. You have done a great job of collecting theoretical material, and maybe even collected everything that was made before on this topic. The contribution of those persons to the topic of the problem is understandable. And what about you?

Mistake 2. No conclusions.

All chapters of research should be summarised. It is not enough to make out the topic understandable for a child and to write the text with your own ideas. At the end of each paragraph, you need to conclude your thoughts.

Mistake 3. No or few links.  

The theoretical part is for that and theoretical, in order to study the materials of the topic and collect the opinions of people that make that before you start. The number of links per page is 4. Of course, this is not an absolute rule, but 1 – 3 links to the paper must be included.

Mistake 4. Lack of connectivity with a practical part of your job

Theory musn’t be just a theory. Try to make logical chain of theory rules and how that can use/help in real life

Mistake 5. Small or huge points, imbalance of parts.

This is another reason why the master of studies may require remaking of a theoretical chapter. It is interesting that an overly large volume of the theory among graduates is, perhaps, more likely than too small.  

Someone allows the difference of parts according to the fact that laziness stops you find the main theme of the thesis, and someone – because of a high level of enthusiasm

Mistake 6. Unscientific style, illiteracy.

Usually, at the time of writing a diploma, a student at least gets a hand on the course books and abstracts, mastering the art of expressing scientifically respectable – copying the style of monographs and scientific articles. But if science is not the hobby of a student, and even a language instinct is not available, confusion in the text of the thesis can reach the level of facepalm. Especially in those places where the student makes personal conclusions. What to do? Seek help from a person who has a scientific style

Can you find at least 1 mistake on your diploma? Change that immediately

Top 5 mistakes in diploma

What is wrong? Why he sent me back?Where is a mistake? And other questions about why your master sand you back with practical part of your diploma.

Lets the battle begin

Mistake 1 Wrong theories.

The mistake is common and difficult to remove, as it is usually necessary to rewrite the entire practice, to assemble in a new way information and perform calculations. Sometimes it is easier to rewrite the theory – if, of course, the topic of the work allows to do that. If you are a philologist, then in the given example, you can leave practice by reworking the theoretical chapter. But it does not always happen.

Mistake  2. Completely different from the introduction.  

Remember: the practical part is written not for an idea that reviewer spends an hour of reading, studying your calculations of the typical trajectories of a sandwich fall. And then, to solve the problem posed in the introduction. For example – reducing an amount of butter when sandwich hit the ground at public establishments. For the successful defense, it is not only the research but logical thinking how to combine your theory with all research, main points, main idea.

Mistake  3. in compliance with the conclusion.  

Success in writing a practical chapter, in general, is strongly tied to a competent drawing of threads to other parts of the work. The practical chapter is too often look like a diploma somehow by itself, calculations and practical conclusions – on their own. And the diploma work looks very stupid, in the conclusion of which it is cheerfully reported: the goal is achieved, the tasks are fulfilled, the hypothesis is proved.

Mistake 4. Bad calculations.  

Twice two, eight? Well done, go and count. You fell so bad if the error has crept into the beginning of calculations. However, we will be frank: many students produce them so that they “come together”. There is a rule of “do not get caught,” because not all reviewers will check your “twice-two”. But it does not take place in all cases. On psychology, for example, you can be lucky but if you are mathematics – no.

Mistake  5. An absence of analysis, a generalization of practical materials.  

Counted everything correctly, designed – flawlessly. And what? But nothing. The conclusions from this are zero. Well, go ahead, darling, reflect on the calculations done, analyze and generally use the brain not only as a calculator.

Everybody wants to see how it look like if you compare with another

We hope that your practical chapter will be written without these annoying mistakes. And that the whole diploma successfully passed the pre-defense and was admitted to the defense

Dissertation writing service

The dissertation is an indispensable progress in the scientific profession, in light of fruitful making out of it the academic degree of a competitor or specialist of sciences is relegated.

Before writing a thesis, s students should contemplate the prerequisites for the work (innovation of the subject, scientific novelty, and practical significance), publish several articles on the topic of the dissertation, and also pass the candidate’s exams before defense. At the heart of any dissertation is one or several problems. You often encounter various difficulties in your practice, both methodically and scientifically. If you are sure that you know the ways to solve painful problems, start writing a scientific work. But first, find out in the Help Desk of your institution whether there are similar jobs. If you know your predecessors, you can take into account the mistakes they make and improve their approach.

After reading the papers on similar topics, proceed to a larger collection of information. Use all sources available to you (from the university library to the modern electronic scientific forums). Properly combining traditions and innovations, you will get people attention of both senior and younger generations.

Schedule if the practical or theoretical part of your work will be more significant to you.

Naturally, both aspects must be studied and described at a high level. But if you are a practicing teacher who has developed his own methodology, then it will be much more important for the professors to learn about your professional achievements. Therefore, at the period of defending dissertations the opponents will attack the very practical part.

While writing a dissertation on pedagogy, you constantly conduct a trial debate your associates. This will help you to distinguish the shortcomings of your work and make rectifications at an early stage.

At the period of summarizing your research, you do not have to overestimate results. Too high statistical indicators are alarming the commission. Follow the strict rules of writing that are approved by your leadership.

Avoid expressive vocabulary and linguistic conversions that are not inherent in scientific style.

Good fortunes with your dissertation and future degree.